Geopolitik Energi

July 6, 2007

AUSTRALIA AKUI ADA FAKTOR MINYAK DI BALIK INVANSI IRAK

http://www.kompas.com/kompas-cetak/0707/06/ln/3663823.htm
Jumat, 06 Juli 2007
 
 
 
Australia Akui Ada Faktor Minyak di Balik Invasi Irak
Sudah 3.580 Tentara AS Tewas sejak 2003canberra, kamis – Untuk pertama kali, Pemerintah Australia mengakui bahwa minyak menjadi faktor kunci di balik dukungan Australia atas invasi Amerika Serikat ke Irak. Semula, Australia selalu menyangkal adanya kepentingan untuk mengamankan suplai minyak sebagai alasan invasi tersebut. Dalam sebuah tinjauan strategi pertahanan Australia yang dirilis Kamis (5/7) disebutkan bahwa “mengamankan sumber daya” di Timur Tengah adalah prioritas utama. “Strategi pertahanan yang kami umumkan hari ini menjabarkan banyak prioritas pertahanan dan keamanan Australia, dan keamanan sumber daya adalah salah satunya,” kata Menteri Pertahanan Australia Brendan Nelson. “Timur Tengah sendiri, tidak hanya Irak, tetapi juga seluruh kawasan Timur Tengah, adalah penyedia energi penting untuk dunia. Australia dan seluruh dunia perlu memikirkan apa yang akan terjadi jika ada penarikan pasukan lebih awal dari Irak,” ujarnya.

Pernyataan tersebut membuktikan argumen para penentang keras Perang Irak bahwa invasi AS pada tahun 2003 lebih didorong kepentingan minyak daripada alasan menemukan senjata pemusnah massal milik Saddam Hussein.

(more…)

Advertisements

May 14, 2007

SETTING INTELIJEN INTERNASIONAL SAAT INI

 power-elite-oil.jpg

Artikel terkait (klik aja):

SIAPA GEORGE W. BUSH?

SIAPA OSAMA BIN LADEN?!

FILE INTELIJEN: KONSPIRASI GLOBAL

TERORISME DAN PIPA MIGAS

SIAPA GEORGE W. BUSH?

bush_family_flow_chart.gif

Artikel terkait (klik aja):

SETTING INTELIJEN INTERNASIONAL SAAT INI

SIAPA OSAMA BIN LADEN?!

FILE INTELIJEN: KONSPIRASI GLOBAL

TERORISME DAN PIPA MIGAS

May 11, 2007

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT ON IRAQ OIL LOBBYING

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2006/0714confidential.htm

Confidential Document on Iraq Oil Lobbying

Commentary by James Paul
Global Policy Forum
July 14, 2006

The governments of the Coalition that overthrew Saddam Hussein announced that they acted because of weapons of mass destruction, terrorist threats, and a desire to install democracy in Iraq. They insisted that their actions had nothing whatsoever to do with oil. A confidential document (klik aja) has now come to light that helps us gain perspective on these official arguments. The document reveals that, in private, the Coalition governments were extremely interested in oil and that intense negotiations were going on, even while the initial fighting was still under way, to parcel out Iraq’s major oil fields. The main decisions were being taken in Washington. Key players – in the UK, Australia, France and elsewhere – saw Washington as the ultimate arbiter of Iraq’s oil resources.

(more…)

CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE DOCUMENTS FEATURE MAP OF IRAQI OILFIELDS

Cheney had Iraq in sights two years ago

(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/07/22/wcheny22.xml)

By Simon English in New York

Last Updated: 12:26am BST 22/07/2003

 

 

Documents released under America’s Freedom of Information Act reveal that an energy task force led by vice-president Dick Cheney was examining Iraq’s oil assets two years before the latest war began.

The papers were obtained after a long battle with the White House by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal charity that opposes government secrecy and which is suing for the dealings of the task force to be made public.

 
Dick Cheney was examining Iraq’s oil assets two years before the latest war began

The emergence of the documents could fuel claims that America’s war in Iraq had as much to do with oil as national security. It also indicates that the Bush administration is beginning to lose the battle to keep its internal workings secret.

The 16 pages, dated March 2001, show maps of Iraq oil fields, pipelines, refineries and terminals. A document titled Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts is also included, listing which countries were keen to do business with Saddam’s regime.

Judicial Watch requested the papers two years ago as part of its investigation into links between the Bush administration and senior energy executives including Enron’s former chairman Ken Lay.

Mr Cheney has fought the release of the documents at every stage. A court ordered two weeks ago that at least some of the task force’s working papers should be made public.

 

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said: “People will draw their own conclusions about the documents, but that is what an open society is about. Given the delay in their release, the Bush administration clearly did not want them to come out.”

A spokesman for Mr Cheney did not return calls yesterday. The US Commerce Department said in a statement: “It is the responsibility of the Commerce Department to serve as a commercial liaison for US companies doing business around the world, including those that develop and utilise energy resources. The Energy Task Force evaluated regions of the world that are vital to global energy supply.”

Judicial Watch isn’t claiming that the documents are proof of any particular intent but say they should be open to public scrutiny.

Mr Fitton said: “Opponents of the war will point to the documents as evidence that the Bush administration was after Iraqi oil. Supporters will say the energy task force would have been remiss if it did not take Iraq’s oil into account.”

Nevertheless, the documents represent a surprising development. Until now it had been assumed that the US government was stonewalling over the energy task force papers because they would show the extent to which major party benefactors, including Enron, effectively wrote national energy policy.

Judicial Watch and other watchdogs are now curious what else may be revealed. A court ordered the government to comply with the Freedom of Information Act and give up these documents more than a year ago. Judicial Watch said it could not explain why the papers were suddenly released. A government spokesman declined to elaborate.

Maps of oil fields and pipelines in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates and a list of energy development projects in those two countries are also included.

Mr Cheney argues that his consultations with the energy industry should be private so that all parties can speak freely. A US court recently described this invoking of executive privilege “extraordinary” and “drastic”.

================================================================

 

Jul 17, 2003 Contact: Press Office
202-646-5188

CHENEY ENERGY TASK FORCE DOCUMENTS FEATURE MAP OF IRAQI OILFIELDS

Commerce & State Department Reports to Task Force Detail Oilfield & Gas Projects, Contracts & Exploration

Saudi Arabian & UAE Oil Facilities Profiled As Well

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption and abuse, said today that documents turned over by the Commerce Department, under court order as a result of Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit concerning the activities of the Cheney Energy Task Force, contain a map of Iraqi oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, as well as 2 charts detailing Iraqi oil and gas projects, and “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts.” The documents, which are dated March 2001, are available on the Internet at: http://www.JudicialWatch.org.

DOWNLOAD!!: cheney-energy-task-force-documents-feature-map-of-iraqi-oilfields.doc

Artikel lain yang terkait (klik aja):

May 10, 2007

ABOUT IRAQ: OIL!

JUST CLICK LINKS BELOW:

May 9, 2007

KONFLIK AMBALAT HANYA MENGUNTUNGKAN PENJAJAH

http://www.dudung.net/index.php?naon=depan&action=detail&id=705&cat=2Artikel Islami
23 Maret 2005 – 16:35
KONFLIK AMBALAT HANYA MENGUNTUNGKAN PENJAJAH

Dalam sepekan ini, selain isu BBM yang masih hangat, yang tidak kalah hangatnya adalah isu Ambalat. Isu ini berkembang setelah pemerintah Malaysia mengklaim kawasan perairan Ambalat sebagai wilayahnya. Klaim ini muncul setelah Malaysia memenangkan putusan Mahkamah Internasional atas sengketa pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan pada tahun 2002. Secara sepihak, Malaysia telah mengklaim wilayah perairan sepanjang 70 mil dari garis pantai Sipadan dan Ligitan sebagai wilayah perairannya. Sementara Indonesia menganggap, kewenangan Malaysia itu hanya 12 mil dari garis pantai kedua pulau tersebut. Padahal secara historis, baik Sipadan, Ligitan, maupun Ambalat sebenarnya merupakan wilayah Kesultanan Bulungan, yang kini menjadi salah satu kabupaten di Kaltim.

May 1, 2007

FACTBOX-Disputed maritime oil and gas areas in Asia

FACTBOX-Disputed maritime oil and gas areas in Asia

Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:17AM EDT

April 30 (Reuters) – Maritime disputes may hold up prospective energy developments in Asia for years or decadesdespite high oil and gas prices, but analysts say joint development is still on the cards.

Here is a factbox on some of the disputed areas. For a related analysis click [ID:nSP201637].

April 25, 2007

SOMALILAND: HOPES AND HYPE ON THE FRONTIER

Copyright (c) 1993 , EMA Business Information.
Reprinted by permission.

Middle East Economic Digest, 2 April 1993, pp.20-21.

Somaliland: Hopes and hype on the new frontier

MARIA KIELMAS

Geologists have speculating about the possibility of oil in Somalia since the last century, but it took the US military Operation Restore Hope to bring this possibility to popular attention. The widespread notion that US troops are sent to Somalia to protect the interests of US oil companies, and their supposed huge oil finds, has been treated with amused derision in oil industry circles. But US military presence which aims to stabilise events in a region increasingly regarded as the backyard of its regional ally, Saudi Arabia, has not been discounted . Over the past l0 years most of the oil industry interest has focused on areas in the north, today the self-declared Republic of Somaliland, which troops have avoided. Any future oil exploration here will depend largely on the international community's recognition of the aspirations of the breakaway state.

Oil seeps were first identified by Italian and British geologists who surveyed the area during the colonial era. These predicted the presence of a sizable oil field just south of Berbera. But it took until the 1960s for the first wells to be drilled here. Three wells known as the Daga Shabell series, regisrered oil shows, but there was no real discovery . There were further small gas discoveries along the east coast and just offshore of Socotra, but nothing of commercial proportions.

OIL HOPES HINGE ON NORTH SOMALIA

Copyright Petroleum Economist Ltd. (UK) 1991.
Petroleum Economist. Vol 58, Issue n10, Oct, 1991, p19(2).

Oil Hopes Hinge on North Somalia

Maria Kielmas

A UN-funded study points to oil potential in Ethiopia and Somalia. Maria Kielmas talked to emerging rulers in the region about their oil policies.

Wars in countries comprising the Horn of Africa put on hold the first real spark of international industry interest in the region's oil prospects. As a variety of political factions wrestle for control in Ethiopia and Somalia, only one group, the Somali National Movement (SNM), which controls the self-proclaimed Republic of Somaliland in northern Somalia, has maintained a positive policy towards foreign oil investment.

Aside from the political conflict, oil exploration in the African Horn has generally been neglected because of a widespread perception throughout the industry that the region is gas-prone and both inaccessible and expensive to explore. The countries around the Gulf of Aden and Red Sea are regarded as too poor to afford the necessary infrastructure for gas development.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.